Wikipedia Editor banned for allowing questioning the Russian Hacker Narrative (2017)

Editors purged anything that didn't fit the "Russians hacked 2016 election because they wanted Trump to win" narrative. Am AP report mentioned that Russians were hacking anyone who opposed Russian interest (not just Hillary Clinton), it started a discussion over purging anything that didn't fit the "Russians hacked 2016 election because they wanted Trump to win" narrative. An editor was attacked and banned for trying to defend a little balance and stop the censoring of counter-points. ℹ️ Info           ~ Aristotle Sabouni Created: 2019-03-26

---

🔗 More

Wikipedia Wikipedia is both hit and miss. Most articles are pretty good, but there's a leftist bias amongst too many articles.

Russiagate The FBI used Hillary's lie about Russian Collusion, to illegally tap, distract and harass Trump, with media complicity.

🔗 Links

• https://apnews.com/3bca5267d4544508bb523fa0db462cb2
• https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/02/01/five-of-the-best-examples-of-left-wing-bias-on-wikipedia-in-2017/

Discussion and purge:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections&diff=prev&oldid=809288218
• https://extranewsfeed.com/wikipedia-editors-implement-purge-of-sources-critical-of-russia-hacking-allegations-71fac8299c2b
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections&diff=prev&oldid=809870234
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=811247924

Tags: Wikipedia  Russiagate