George Mason University
From iGeek
GMU did studies of Climatologists and found 73% thought there was proof of global warming, 56% finds IPCC untrustworthy.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2017-03-29 |
George Mason University did the largest study of Climatologists in 2007 and found:
- While 84% thought Global Warming existed, only 73% thought there was proof
- "existed" is a far lower standard than the IPCC's "man caused 90% of Global Warming"
The 2010 follow-up they found:
- "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”
- "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes
- Only 31% believe "humans are primarily responsible”
- Only 24% "see any evidence of climate change in their local weather patterns"
- "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening”.
All blowing up the idea that there's consensus, or agreement with the IPCC.
2010 George Mason University
After their 2007 Survey, they decided to do a follow up of with their meteorologists and found:
- "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes, and only 31% believe humans are primarily responsible”
- "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”
- Only 24% "see any evidence of climate change in their local weather patterns"
- "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening”.
- All of which completely refutes the whole scientific consensus.
- http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2010-A-National-Survey-Of-Television-Meteorologists-about-Climate-Change_Preliminary-Findings.pdf
- https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/majority-broadcast-meteorologists-skeptical-global-warming-crisis
2007 George Mason University
This found that:
- 84% of Climatologists thought AGW “existed"
- Only 73% thought there was proof of that point
- And as we’ve discussed, “existed" is a far lower bar than, “man’s CO2 is causing 90% of the warming".
👁️ See also
- Climate - The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.
- Climate Models - Seriousness comes when Climate Model developers have code reviews, and publish their code, documentation, and data.
- Climate Religion - Climate "Science" has all the tenets of being a religion (or Cult). Believe the high priests: or else.
- Electric Cars - Electric cars are great for the tech side, but their green cred is in dispute.
- Ocean Warming - Fake environmentalists, re-release scares about how everything is worse than they thought; the oceans are warming more.
- Paris Climate Accord - A fake agreement that let the largest polluters do what they wanted, while the U.S. would be punished for being better.
🔗 More
| |
| |
Tags: Climate Study NoIndex Consensus Skeptic