Critical Race Theory
CRT came from Marxist Critical Theory that divides us (by race) in order to control us.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2021-05-24 |
Facts[edit | edit source]
- Critical Race Theory/Any Lives Matter - 1st grader disciplined for adding "Any Lives Matter" to a BLM drawing that was an assignment. The parent was never notified of the incident or discipline (learned of it later from another Parent). The Parent is suing.
- Critical Race Theory/PolitiFact on Winsome Earle-Sears - While Fact Checking Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears Politifact totally blows it. They corrected her claims that Loudoun County School spent about $300K on CRT, by saying it was only $30K -- which would have still shown her correct, as the left was claiming that CRT doesn't exist. But then receipts show it was $397,500, and the fact-checkers failed/misrepresented.
- Paul Krugman - He thinks that Florida banning anti-American, Marxist, disinformation (alternate history/reality aka CRT) is the same as being left wing thought police. It isn't. The left is trying to censor opposing truths/perceptions, the right is trying to reduce leftist lies (teach both sides) and staying age appropriate. Huge difference, that escapes the smartest man on the left.
History[edit | edit source]
To understand Critical Race Theory, you need to understand the history of Marxism and Critical Theory, which is where it came from.
Marxism is founded on class envy: the idea that the imbalance of incomes will cause the workers to rise up, seize all property (the means of production), and redistribute wealth based on his more equitable views of Socialist Utopia (with politicians and thinkers like him in the ruling class, instead of right industrialists).
While it could happen in low-educated non-developed agrarian countries like Russia becoming the USSR, Marx' ideology failed in more liberal societies of Europe and America. People were living better lives on the bottom of those societies than in the middle tier of socialized countries, and they knew that through education, hard work, and perseverance, they (or their kids) could overcome their social station and rise up the class structure. (Called the American Dream). This was proven by how much new wealth and new wealthy there were -- not to mention very high class mobility.
So 60 years after the failures of Das Kapital (1867), the Socialists (Marxists) realized that the Class Struggle and the idea of violent revolution wasn't working as an impetus to cause the fall of western countries -- they needed a new capital to appeal to the unwashed masses. They noticed that part of the reasons for the failure of Socialisms appeal was that people were proud of their countries (cultures) and their race -- and they weren't willing to risk what they had for theoretical utopia. So the National Syndicalists branch of Socialism was formed (this later became the Nations Socialists Workers Party / Fascists). The idea being that they would use nationalism and racism as the replacement for the class struggle. Instead of hating/envying the rich/management, they could be taught to hate the foreigners outside and inside the country (the Jews, Gypsies, French, Russians and mentally deficient wastes of food). Also, to mitigate the fear of revolution, they would replace revolutionary socialism (Marxism), with evolution socialism (fascism). They still got the same authoritarian ends, and a society divided not based on merit, income -- but one divided based on being part of the political class or not -- and they got to have selective liberties and redistribution of wealth -- they just did it by using the industrialists as the proxies for the government. If they could tax, legislate and regulate the industries into compliance of government will, it didn't matter if the ownership wasn't technically the governments, because the power and control was still run by the central planners. And that was Fascism.
Well, after WWII, that turned out to be as big a disaster as Marxism. Marxists/Socialists needed to distance themselves from the first two attempts, and needed to rework it in ways that would be more appealing to the American and Europe that was emerging.
They went back to the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory that had lead to the rise of the Fascists, and tweaked the beliefs, just a little. The underlying philosophy was "to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them"... and in their minds, the things holding them back from achieving their higher purpose of being good cogs in the socialist machine was their social structures, ideology and culture were holding them back. Of course it is a fallacy that they were enslaved in an economically free society, or that enslaving them in a socialist one (by robbing them of wealth, or any thoughts that were sanctioned by the state) was somehow liberating. But socialists don't really think about what they're really advocating, just how to rationalize any means to their ends (tyranny and control, in the name of "equity"). To rebuild a society as socialist utopia, you need to first tear down the institution, ideology and culture (and history) that exists. That means finding flaws in everything that wasn't socialist. You can to convince the gullible that (a) utopia can be achieved (b) that things are worse than they are (and always have been) (c) that things are so bad you must risk what it, to achieve what might be. (Without ever considering the motives of the puppet-masters, or the likely consequences of the policies that will lead to utopia, or acknowledging what has really happened everywhere it was tried).
Thus critical theory splintered into many specific special interest critical theories (meant to undermine the culture and history): race, gender, imperialism (war) and environment. Each of these, was a tool to spread marxism: that the system was broken as proven by their alternate history/reality, and thus had to be remade to progress.
- Critical Race Theory - Instead of saying that National and Racial superiority would be the impetus of change, they inverted it -- to national, racial and cultural crimes of the past was why we had to change everything. It failed in the 50's and 60's, because society was implementing civil rights through non-violent means.
- Critical Gender Theory - Marxists tried to do the same with sexism and Women's liberation movement and tear apart society based on gender inequality. But while they were able to radicalize a few feminists, or the least critical thinking -- most of society went along with empowering women and making sure they had equal opportunities. At least enough progress was being made that there wasn't going to be violence over it.
- Critical Imperialism (War) Theory - while it usually isn't called that, is the marxist teachings that America (and the west) is flawed because in the era of "rule by conquest", it was more successful than the East or Native American. Again, they tried this during the vietnam war (and the useful idiots peaceniks), but while they disrupted things for a while, Nixon got us out of Kennedy/Johnson's war, and a lot of the momentum there stopped.
- Critical Environmental Theory - is not what it is usually called. Watermelon Environmentalism is the more common term: but same idea. Using some faux excuse for humanity is failing in the environment and future of humanity, so we need to hand over the laws/regulations/control to Marxists to save us.
And so on.
Think Harder[edit | edit source]
Think about what they're actually teaching/saying:
- The culture that's been one of the least oppressive towards women in recorded history is institutionally sexist?
- The only society that fought a civil war to free another group/race (that wasn't in the majority), and then marched for their civil rights, is the most racist?
- A country that has maybe a dozen suspicious shootings by cops per year (and as many against latino's and twice as many against whites) is somehow systemically racist against blacks? When more whites and cops are killed by blacks, than blacks are killed by whites or cops?
- The only Institutional/Systemic Racism allowed, are things like affirmative action: which favors blacks.
- More and more we're getting whites, pretending to be black to get minority admitmance into Universities, Job Oppportunities, Special Loans and other black priviledges.
If that's a race war and sysemic oppression, they're doing it wrong!
As long as we can point out the ridiculous incongruities of leftist thought, Marxism will flow amongst the ignorant, and ebb when exposed to the light of truth and real history/present.
So Marxists divide based on some scapegoat like Germany and the evil Jews, Lenin and the evil Factory workers, Occupy with the evil Bankers, and CRT advocates where the entire system has conspired to uniquely hold the black man down.
They want to tear down the nation, by convincing the gullible that things are so bad, they need violent overthrow to get what they want.
If they wanted to fix injustice:
- they would suppport the community, and not the gangs
- they would support the victims, and not freeing criminals
- they would support Grandma and homemakers have guns to defend themselves, and not the state the power to take them away
- they would support Israel, and not Hamas
- they would support innocent babies from being aborted, and not their murderers
The more injustice they can create in society, the more they think that will convince others to empower them with the tools to fix it. So they are on the wrong side of most problems, in the hopes that people will see them as the cure. When it is all just an excuse for them to demand progressive marxist hegemony.
Conclusion[edit | edit source]
- Marxists want to sieze power, so they can guide us under their bennevolent dictatorship.
- People don't want Marxism: to be enslaved to an elite ruling class, loaning us temporary (and restricted) liberties and redistributing our incomes (and only giving us back what we "need"). So Marxism must be covert and deceptive and make the cause about something else.
- So Marxist need to tear down our social norms, history, see injustice everywhere -- and to divide us (by race, class, gender, ideology and culture), or whatever it takes to give them the power to fix Social Injustice. And of course, any power so great that could fix these problems is also enough to enslave us.
- Critical Theory (Critical Race Theory), Black Liberation Theology, BLM, Accorn, Community Organizers, Antifa, Occupy Wall Street, etc, are all Marxists. Thus the organizations goals are not really fixing racial injustice, but getting us to Marxism.
- Some of the adherents to these groups or causes (or their allies/media) are "Useful Idiots" (using Stalin's colloquialism): they might truly believe in the "cause" they have been sold as a false flag for Marxim, but they are still tools advancing Marxism, even if they aren't introspective enough to get it. Knknowing Marxist are still Marxists.
Video[edit | edit source]
The Equal Opportunity Race  |
|---|
The Marxist CRT training video that they're teaching teachers to teach in VA schools (or show directly). |
🔗 More
| |
| |
| |
Tags: Terms Racism/all Black Lives Matter/all
