Bray and Von Starch
From iGeek
2003 and 1996 studies showed a nice even bell curve agreed/disagreed with the Global Warming consensus. No 97% concensus.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2017-03-29 |
Bray and Von Starch in 2003 and 1996[edit | edit source]
This actually mapped a nice curve of how many disagreed or agreed with Global Warming consensus (on a 1-7 scale) and got a nice bell curve distribution, weighted in the middle, based on severity of agreement: which refuted a strong consensus (people were all over the board), but it was becoming too political, so they stopped doing their poll.
👁️ See also
- Climate - The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.
- Climate Models - Seriousness comes when Climate Model developers have code reviews, and publish their code, documentation, and data.
- Climate Religion - Climate "Science" has all the tenets of being a religion (or Cult). Believe the high priests: or else.
- Electric Cars - Electric cars are great for the tech side, but their green cred is in dispute.
- Ocean Warming - Fake environmentalists, re-release scares about how everything is worse than they thought; the oceans are warming more.
- Paris Climate Accord - A fake agreement that let the largest polluters do what they wanted, while the U.S. would be punished for being better.
🔗 More
| |
| |
